"Justice Stalled The Controversial Decision on Dengvaxia Cases Sparks Outrage"  This title effectively captures the essence of the blog post by highlighting the controversy surrounding the Department of Justice's (DOJ) decision to dismiss 98 cases related to the Dengvaxia vaccine.

"Justice Stalled The Controversial Decision on Dengvaxia Cases Sparks Outrage" This title effectively captures the essence of the blog post by highlighting the controversy surrounding the Department of Justice's (DOJ) decision to dismiss 98 cases related to the Dengvaxia vaccine.

"Justice Stalled The Controversial Decision on Dengvaxia Cases Sparks Outrage" This title effectively captures the essence of the blog post by highlighting the controversy surrounding the Department of Justice's (DOJ) decision to dismiss 98 cases related to the Dengvaxia vaccine.



Title Justice Stalled The Controversial Decision on Dengvaxia Cases Sparks Outrage

The recent decision by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to dismiss 98 cases related to the controversial Dengvaxia vaccine has sparked widespread outrage and dismay. Dr. Anthony Leachon, a prominent health reform advocate and former special adviser for non-communicable diseases at the Department of Health (DOH), has been vocal in his criticism of the DOJ's decision.

In an interview with The Manila Times, Leachon expressed his deep disappointment and frustration over the DOJ's decision to dismiss the cases despite the availability of obvious proofs that showed a pattern of adverse effects following vaccination. He emphasized that the parents of the victims are still seeking justice and demanding accountability from those responsible for the harm caused by the vaccine.

One of the primary concerns raised by Leachon is the alleged conflict of interest involving DOJ Undersecretary Jesse Andres, who has control and supervision over the National Prosecution Service (NPS). According to Leachon, Andres's prior relationship with former health secretary Janette Garin, one of the principal accused in the Dengvaxia case, raises questions about whether his appointment was influenced by this connection. This perceived conflict of interest has sparked concerns about the impartiality of the justice system.

Leachon also lamented the lack of a law that addresses conflict of interest between medical professionals and the pharmaceutical industry. He emphasized that this is particularly important in cases where doctors are accused of putting their own interests above those of their patients, as was alleged to have occurred in the Dengvaxia case.

The Public Attorney's Office (PAO) has filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to rectify the situation and avoid further injustice. The PAO's motion highlighted the suffering and loss experienced by the victims' families and emphasized that justice must be served.

As the controversy surrounding the Dengvaxia vaccine continues to unfold, it is essential that we prioritize transparency and accountability in our legal system. The dismissal of these cases without a thorough investigation and consideration of the evidence presented has sparked widespread outrage and frustration. It is crucial that we learn from this experience and ensure that justice is served for all parties involved.

Keywords DOJ, Dengvaxia, conflict of interest, justice, accountability, transparency


Avatar

Edward Lance Arellano Lorilla

CEO / Co-Founder

Enjoy the little things in life. For one day, you may look back and realize they were the big things. Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.

Cookie
We care about your data and would love to use cookies to improve your experience.