The Malapropism of Trump's USAID Closures A Threat to Global Soft Power

The Malapropism of Trump's USAID Closures A Threat to Global Soft Power

As I reflect on the term malapropism, which refers to the act of using a word or phrase incorrectly, it is clear that President Donald Trump's demand to shut down the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) constitutes a grave malapropism. This misguided attempt to dismantle a vital source of global soft power lacks concrete evidence and imperils America's credibility and global security.

The Imperiled Global Soft Power

USAID is not simply another government agency; it embodies American influence and humanitarian efforts worldwide. With an annual budget of approximately $70 billion, USAID runs health and emergency programs in over 120 countries, including some of the poorest regions on earth. Its presence has helped stabilize fragile states, provide aid during natural disasters, and promote economic development.

In an era where China is increasingly flexing its muscles globally, USAID's shutdown would be a significant blow to American soft power. It would send a signal that the United States is no longer committed to international cooperation and humanitarian efforts. This would not only undermine America's credibility but also create opportunities for other nations to fill the void.

The Lack of Evidence

Trump's decision to close USAID is based on his assertion that corruption is at levels rarely seen before. However, he provides no concrete evidence to support this claim. In fact, the agency has a reputation for transparency and accountability, with rigorous auditing processes in place to prevent fraud and mismanagement.

Countering Misconceptions

Some may argue that USAID's budget is too large or that its programs are ineffective. However, these claims are based on flawed assumptions and lack empirical evidence. A study by the Pew Research Center found that international assistance makes up only between 0.7% to 1.4% of total US government spending over the past quarter century.

Others may suggest that USAID's programs are wasteful and inefficient. However, this is a misconception. The agency has a track record of delivering effective aid and support, including disaster response efforts in countries such as Haiti and Nepal.

Conclusion

In conclusion, President Trump's demand to shut down USAID is a malapropism of epic proportions. It is an attempt to destroy a vital source of global soft power without any concrete evidence to back up his claims. The shutdown would not only undermine America's credibility but also create opportunities for other nations to fill the void.

As Samantha Power, former USAID chief under President Joe Biden, aptly put it, We are witnessing one of the worst and most costly foreign policy blunders in US history. Unless this malapropism is halted, future generations will marvel at how an American president and his billionaire ally were able to erode US standing and global security.

Final Thoughts

As we reflect on Trump's USAID closures, let us not forget the wisdom of a well-known phrase A malapropism is like a broken bridge – it may look strong on the surface, but beneath the surface lies chaos and destruction.

Edward Lance Arellano Lorilla

CEO / Co-Founder

Enjoy the little things in life. For one day, you may look back and realize they were the big things. Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.