"The Canard of Disinformation How Cognitive Scientists Professionals Can Benefit from Pro-Duterte Bloggers' Snub" Note that "canard" is an uncommon word that refers to a false or misleading idea, which in this case is the notion that pro-Duterte bloggers are somehow justified in snubbing a hearing on fake news and disinformation.

The Canard of Disinformation How Cognitive Scientists Professionals Can Benefit from Pro-Duterte Bloggers' Snub

As cognitive scientists professionals, understanding human behavior and decision-making is crucial to our work. However, in today's digital age, disinformation has become a significant threat to informed decision-making. The recent snub by pro-Duterte bloggers at a House hearing on fake news and disinformation online serves as a prime example of this canard. In this blog post, we will explore how cognitive scientists professionals can benefit from analyzing the motivations behind this snub.

The Prevalence of Disinformation

Disinformation has become a rampant problem in today's digital landscape. According to a report by the National Academy of Sciences, disinformation is false or misleading information intended to deceive people and sway their opinions. This can be spread through various means, including social media platforms, fake news outlets, and even mainstream media.

The recent snub by pro-Duterte bloggers at a House hearing on fake news and disinformation online exemplifies this issue. The House panel issued show-cause orders against several social media figures who failed to attend the hearing, including former National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict officials Lorraine Badoy and Jeffrey Celis, actress Vivian Velez, former broadcaster Jay Sonza, and bloggers Sass Sasot, Jun Abines, Mark Anthony Lopez, Lord Byron Cristobal (Banat By), and Krizette Chu.

Cognitive Scientists Professionals The Key to Understanding Disinformation

As cognitive scientists professionals, we can play a crucial role in understanding the motivations behind this snub. Our expertise in human behavior, decision-making, and social psychology can help us identify the underlying factors that drive individuals to spread disinformation online.

One key takeaway from this incident is the importance of understanding psychological drivers. According to a study published in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, people motivated by a desire for social status and attention are more likely to engage in online behaviors that promote disinformation.

The Role of Cognitive Biases

Another crucial factor to consider is cognitive biases. Cognitive biases refer to mental shortcuts or heuristics that we use when making decisions. These biases can lead us to make irrational or illogical decisions, especially when we are under pressure or stressed.

In the context of this incident, cognitive biases such as confirmation bias and the availability heuristic may have played a significant role in shaping people's behaviors online. Confirmation bias refers to the tendency for individuals to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs, while the availability heuristic refers to the tendency for individuals to overestimate the importance or likelihood of an event based on how easily it comes to mind.

Social Pressure A Significant Influencer

Social pressure is another crucial factor that can influence people's behaviors online. When we are part of a group or community, we tend to conform to the norms and values of that group in order to avoid social exclusion or rejection. This phenomenon is known as social conformity.

In the context of this incident, social pressure may have played a significant role in shaping people's decisions to attend or not attend the hearing. For example, if an individual was part of a pro-Duterte online community, they may have felt pressured to conform to the norms and values of that community by snubbing the hearing.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the snub by pro-Duterte bloggers at a House hearing on fake news and disinformation online is a prime example of the canard of disinformation. Cognitive scientists professionals can play a crucial role in understanding the motivations behind this snub by analyzing psychological drivers, cognitive biases, and social pressures that shape people's behaviors online.

By integrating our knowledge of human behavior, decision-making, and social psychology with the latest research on disinformation, we can develop more effective strategies for combating this problem. It is essential that we continue to explore innovative solutions to this challenge in order to ensure a safer and more informed online environment.

Recommendations

Based on our analysis of the snub by pro-Duterte bloggers at a House hearing on fake news and disinformation online, we recommend

1. Develop Targeted Interventions Develop targeted interventions that address specific psychological drivers, cognitive biases, and social pressures that contribute to people's behaviors online.
2. Promote Media Literacy Promote media literacy programs that teach individuals how to critically evaluate information and identify disinformation online.
3. Encourage Online Civility Encourage online civility by promoting respectful and constructive dialogue in online communities.

By following these recommendations, we can work towards creating a safer and more informed online environment for all.

Edward Lance Arellano Lorilla

CEO / Co-Founder

Enjoy the little things in life. For one day, you may look back and realize they were the big things. Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.