Swiss President Weighs in on Vance's Speech A Plea for Direct Democracy This title accurately reflects the main topic of the article, which is Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter's response to US Vice President JD Vance's speech at the Munich Security Conference. The title also highlights the theme of direct democracy and freedom of speech, which are key points in the article.

Title Swiss President Weighs in on Vance's Speech A Plea for Direct Democracy

The recent speech by US Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference has sparked intense debate across Europe. Switzerland's president, Karin Keller-Sutter, has now shared her thoughts on the matter, describing Vance's address as a plea for direct democracy that resonated deeply with her own values.

Controversy Across Europe

Vance's speech drew widespread criticism from European leaders who saw it as a combative broadside against their continent and Germany in particular. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz was among those who expressed outrage over Vance's claims that Europe is limiting free speech and excluding parties that voice strong concerns over immigration.

Swiss President Offers Perspective

In an interview with Le Temps daily, Keller-Sutter took a more measured approach, praising the very liberal principle expressed in Vance's speech. She noted that Vance had spoken about the need to defend values like freedom and the possibility for the population to express itself, sentiments that echoed Switzerland's own commitment to direct democracy.

Direct Democracy A Swiss Specialty

As the president of a country known for its frequent recourse to referendums, Keller-Sutter has a deep understanding of the importance of giving citizens a direct say in government decisions. She believes that Vance's speech was a call to listen to the population and defend their right to express themselves.

Freedom of Speech A Fundamental Right

Vance had spoken out against what he saw as EU commissars stifling free expression, saying that across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat. Keller-Sutter acknowledged that Vance's criticism was his opinion, but she agreed that the right to freedom of speech is a fundamental principle that must be defended.

No Room for Firewalls

The Swiss president also highlighted Vance's emphasis on the need to defend values that we share, like freedom and the possibility for the population to express itself. She noted that Vance had spoken about the importance of direct democracy, saying that there was no room for firewalls or exclusionary policies.

Ukraine Truce Talks A Concerned Perspective

When asked about US efforts to broker a Ukraine truce deal with Moscow, Keller-Sutter played down concerns over Trump's announcement, saying that it was likely an evolving process. She stressed the importance of involving Ukraine and Europe in any talks between the US and Russia.

Calm Consideration

In conclusion, Keller-Sutter urged against panic and emphasized the need for calm and measured consideration in evaluating Vance's speech and its implications. As the world continues to grapple with the complexities of global politics, her words serve as a reminder that direct democracy is not just a Swiss specialty, but a fundamental principle that must be defended and cherished.

Keywords JD Vance, Munich Security Conference, direct democracy, freedom of speech, Ukraine truce talks, Switzerland.

I made the following changes

Minor edits for grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure to improve readability and flow.
Added transitional phrases to connect ideas between paragraphs.
Changed some sentence structures to make them more concise and clear.
Added a few words here and there to enhance tone and professionalism.
Reformatted the text to create clear sections and headings.
No major changes were made to the content, as it was already well-written.

Edward Lance Arellano Lorilla

CEO / Co-Founder

Enjoy the little things in life. For one day, you may look back and realize they were the big things. Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.