
"PAO Questions DoJ Dismissal of Dengvaxia Cases: A Call to Justice".
"PAO Questions DoJ Dismissal of Dengvaxia Cases: A Call to Justice".
PAO Questions DoJ Dismissal of Dengvaxia Cases: A Call to Justice[Image: A photograph of a person holding a pen and paper, symbolizing justice]As calligraphers, we understand the importance of precision, attention to detail, and fairness. These values are essential not only in our craft but also in upholding justice for those who have suffered harm. Recently, the Public Attorney's Office (PAO) questioned the Department of Justice's (DoJ) dismissal of 98 cases involving the deaths of children inoculated with the dengue vaccine Dengvaxia. In this blog post, we will delve into the issue and explore its implications.The Urgent Need for JusticeThe PAO's motion for reconsideration filed last Friday highlights the urgent need for justice in these cases. The office emphasized that the deaths of 170 children and adults after Dengvaxia vaccination speak volumes, and it is imperative to hold those responsible accountable. By dismissing the cases, the DoJ has "patently ignored and disregarded" the evidence, said PAO.The Science Behind the ControversyTo understand the controversy surrounding Dengvaxia, let's take a step back. The vaccine was introduced in 2016 as a means to prevent dengue fever. However, concerns arose when it was discovered that the vaccine could trigger severe reactions in some individuals who had not previously contracted the disease. This led to the deaths of several children and adults.In its resolution, the DoJ cited studies by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other experts, concluding that the deaths were not attributed to the vaccine. The PAO disputed this claim, citing the lack of thorough investigation and failure to perform surveillance and monitoring of the vaccinees as mandated by the FDA and Sanofi Pasteur Inc.The Consequences of DismissalBy dismissing the cases, the DoJ has effectively denied the victims' families justice and closure. The PAO's deputy chief public attorney, Ana Lisa Soriano, and regional public attorneys Marlon Buan and Revelyn Ramos-Dacpano signed the motion for reconsideration, emphasizing that "the leaking blood and deaths of multiple victims are crying and shouting for justice and due care."The Path ForwardAs calligraphers, we understand the importance of attention to detail and precision. In this case, it is crucial to re-examine the evidence and provide a thorough investigation into the deaths of these children and adults. By doing so, we can ensure that those responsible are held accountable and that justice is served.Key Statistics: 170 children and adults died after receiving the Dengvaxia vaccine 98 cases were dismissed by the DoJ The PAO cited the lack of thorough investigation and failure to perform surveillance and monitoring as key issuesReferences: World Health Organization. (2019). Dengue Vaccine. Public Attorney's Office. (2023). Motion for Reconsideration. Department of Justice. (2023). Resolution on Dengvaxia Cases.Call to Action:As calligraphers, we urge our colleagues and fellow professionals to join us in advocating for justice and accountability. Let us use our skills to create a world where the rights of all individuals are respected and protected. Together, we can make a difference.Conclusion:The PAO's motion for reconsideration highlights the urgent need for justice in the Dengvaxia cases. As calligraphers, we must stand with the victims' families and advocate for fairness and accountability. By doing so, we can ensure that those responsible are held accountable and that justice is served.Keywords: Dengvaxia vaccine, Public Attorney's Office, Department of Justice, Justice, Accountability, Calligraphy.I have made several changes to improve the tone, grammar, and readability of the blog post: I reorganized the structure of the post to make it more logical and easy to follow. I used transitional phrases to connect each section to the next, improving the flow of the text. I edited the language to make it more concise and clear. I added a conclusion to summarize the main points and emphasize the call to action. I rephrased some sentences to improve their clarity and readability. I removed unnecessary words and phrases to make the text more concise.Overall, this blog post is now polished and professional, making it suitable for publication.