Bonoan denies alleged box deliveries
Bonoan denies alleged box deliveries

The Impact of Bonoan's Denial A Review of the Sandiganbayan Third Divisi[6D[K
Division's Hearing
Introduction
The recent hearing by the Sandiganbayan Third Division regarding alleged bo[2D[K
box deliveries has sent shockwaves throughout the nation. At the center of [K
this controversy is former Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) S[1D[K
Secretary Manuel Bonoan, who has categorically denied the allegations. In t[1D[K
this blog post, we will examine the impact of Bonoan's denial and explore t[1D[K
the implications for the ongoing investigation.
The Allegations
Vergel Niño Garcia, a former driver of state witness Roberto Bernardo, test[4D[K
testified before the Sandiganbayan Third Division that he delivered 55 boxe[4D[K
boxes to Bonoan in November 2024. According to Garcia, these boxes were all[3D[K
allegedly meant for Bonoan and contained unknown contents.
Bonoan's Denial
In response to the allegations, Bonoan issued a statement denying any knowl[5D[K
knowledge of the alleged deliveries. He described Garcia's testimony as fa[3D[K
false and uncorroborated. Bonoan emphasized that he was not involved in[2D[K
in any manner with the subject case involving former senator Revilla Jr.
Impact on the Investigation
The denial by Bonoan has significant implications for the ongoing investiga[9D[K
investigation into the malversation through falsification case filed agains[6D[K
against former senator Bong Revilla and other individuals. The prosecution'[12D[K
prosecution's failure to provide specific details surrounding Garcia's alle[4D[K
allegations or corroborating evidence has led some to question the credibil[8D[K
credibility of the testimony.
Defense Reaction
Revilla's lawyer, Reody Anthony Balisi, reacted strongly to the testimony, [K
stating that it was not believable and that the defense would continue to[2D[K
to assert that there is no evidence linking Revilla to the project in Pandi[5D[K
Pandi. Balisi emphasized that the focus should be on the NCR projects being[5D[K
being discussed, rather than the alleged box deliveries.
Conclusion
The denial by Bonoan has raised questions about the credibility of the alle[4D[K
allegations and the investigation as a whole. The prosecution's failure to [K
provide specific details or corroborating evidence has led some to question[8D[K
question the validity of Garcia's testimony. As the investigation continues[9D[K
continues, it will be important for the Sandiganbayan Third Division to car[3D[K
carefully consider the implications of Bonoan's denial and ensure that the [K
truth is revealed.
Keywords Sandiganbayan Third Division, Manuel Bonoan, Vergel Niño Garc[4D[K
Garcia, Roberto Bernardo, Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), m[1D[K
malversation through falsification, former senator Bong Revilla.